说明
使用 VLD 内存泄漏检测工具辅助开发时整理的学习笔记。本篇介绍 VLD 配置文件中配置项 StackWalkMethod 的使用方法。同系列文章目录可见 《内存泄漏检测工具》目录
目录
1. 配置文件使用说明
在程序中通过 #include "vld.h"
的方式检测内存泄漏时,VLD 首先会尝试在程序的生成目录下读取 vld.ini
文件,若未读取成功,则会尝试在 VLD 的安装目录下读取 vld.ini
文件,若仍未读取成功,则会使用内置的默认配置,内置的默认配置如果不动源码是无法更改的,因此通过修改相应目录下的 vld.ini
文件来定制 VLD 功能是最好的选择。当配置参数等号右边为空,或者给配置了不合法值时,在使用过程中会被程序重置到默认值。
2. 设置调用堆栈的跟踪方法
参数名:StackWalkMethod
。
有效赋值:fast
,safe
。
默认值:fast
。
功能说明:设置调用堆栈的跟踪方法。fast
方法速度快但跟踪的调用堆栈可能不完整,会漏掉一些;safe
方法能更可靠地获得完整的调用堆栈,但速度会慢很多,有可能导致被检测的程序性能出现显著下降,这时为了减少检测时间,可以将配置项 MaxTraceFrames
设置得小一些。
2.1 测试代码
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QDebug>
#include <QTime>
#include "vld.h"
void testFun(int i)
{
if (i > 1)
{
testFun(i-1);
}else
{
int *ptr = new int(i);
printf("ptr = %08x, *ptr = %08x.\n", ptr, *ptr);
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
QTime timedebuge;
timedebuge.start();
testFun(30);
qDebug() << "Elapsed Time: " << timedebuge.elapsed() << "ms";
return a.exec();
}
测试环境:QT 5.9.2,MSVC 2015 32bit,Debug 模式,VLD 版本为 2.5.1,VLD 配置文件只对该参数做修改,测试工程所在路径为:E:\Cworkspace\Qt 5.9\QtDemo\testVLD
。
2.2 StackWalkMethod = fast 时的输出
标准输出窗显示:
ptr = 006e90c0, *ptr = 00000001.
Elapsed Time: 1 ms
VLD 输出报告:
Visual Leak Detector read settings from: D:\Program Files (x86)\Visual Leak Detector\vld.ini
Visual Leak Detector Version 2.5.1 installed.
WARNING: Visual Leak Detector detected memory leaks!
---------- Block 1 at 0x006E90C0: 4 bytes ----------
Leak Hash: 0x03496A17, Count: 1, Total 4 bytes
Call Stack (TID 11760):
ucrtbased.dll!malloc()
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\heap\new_scalar.cpp (19): testVLD.exe!operator new() + 0x9 bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (13): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0x7 bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (25): testVLD.exe!main() + 0x7 bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (74): testVLD.exe!invoke_main() + 0x1B bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (264): testVLD.exe!__scrt_common_main_seh() + 0x5 bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (309): testVLD.exe!__scrt_common_main()
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_main.cpp (17): testVLD.exe!mainCRTStartup()
KERNEL32.DLL!BaseThreadInitThunk() + 0x19 bytes
ntdll.dll!RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath() + 0x11E bytes
ntdll.dll!RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath() + 0xEE bytes
Data:
01 00 00 00 ........ ........
Visual Leak Detector detected 1 memory leak (40 bytes).
Largest number used: 40 bytes.
Total allocations: 40 bytes.
Visual Leak Detector is now exiting.
2.3 StackWalkMethod = safe 时的输出
标准输出窗显示:
ptr = 012aa388, *ptr = 00000001.
Elapsed Time: 18 ms
VLD 输出报告:
Visual Leak Detector read settings from: D:\Program Files (x86)\Visual Leak Detector\vld.ini
Visual Leak Detector Version 2.5.1 installed.
Using the "safe" (but slow) stack walking method.
WARNING: Visual Leak Detector detected memory leaks!
---------- Block 1 at 0x012AA388: 4 bytes ----------
Leak Hash: 0x9281F97B, Count: 1, Total 4 bytes
Call Stack (TID 30696):
ucrtbased.dll!malloc()
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\heap\new_scalar.cpp (19): testVLD.exe!operator new() + 0x9 bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (13): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0x7 bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (10): testVLD.exe!testFun() + 0xC bytes
e:\cworkspace\qt 5.9\qtdemo\testvld\main.cpp (25): testVLD.exe!main() + 0x7 bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (74): testVLD.exe!invoke_main() + 0x1B bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (264): testVLD.exe!__scrt_common_main_seh() + 0x5 bytes
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_common.inl (309): testVLD.exe!__scrt_common_main()
f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcstartup\src\startup\exe_main.cpp (17): testVLD.exe!mainCRTStartup()
KERNEL32.DLL!BaseThreadInitThunk() + 0x19 bytes
ntdll.dll!RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath() + 0x11E bytes
ntdll.dll!RtlGetAppContainerNamedObjectPath() + 0xEE bytes
Data:
01 00 00 00 ........ ........
Visual Leak Detector detected 1 memory leak (40 bytes).
Largest number used: 40 bytes.
Total allocations: 40 bytes.
Visual Leak Detector is now exiting.
2.4 输出结果对比
- 当
StackWalkMethod = fast
时,耗时1 ms
,此次检测输出了全部的调用堆栈。 - 当
StackWalkMethod = safe
时,耗时18 ms
,也检测输出了全部的调用堆栈。
- StackWalkMethod Detector Visual Leakstackwalkmethod detector visual leak detector visual leak vld detector方式visual leak skipheapfreeleaks detector visual leak 源码detector visual leak detector visual leak 2015 skipcrtstartupleaks detector visual leak forceincludemodulesmd detector visual leak detector版本visual leak traceinternalframes detector visual leak